Comments for MLMZing http://www.mlmzing.com Exact Marketing Blueprints for Network Marketers Sat, 26 Nov 2011 05:03:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by Rob Fore Review http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-300 Rob Fore Review Sat, 26 Nov 2011 05:03:05 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-300 [...] he is an Executive Distributor and made the top 20 Team Builder List.  He’s also involved with My Lead System Pro (Attraction [...] [...] he is an Executive Distributor and made the top 20 Team Builder List.  He’s also involved with My Lead System Pro (Attraction [...]

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by admin http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-282 admin Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:28:50 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-282 Great Monica. We're looking forward to helping you over here! Great Monica.
We’re looking forward to helping you over here!

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by Monica http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-281 Monica Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:44:22 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-281 I am in my "trial" week with MLSP. I hope I can get out of there quickly. Because MLMZing is definately my choice. If I had come aware of MLMZing a week ago, I would definately not have joined MLSP. Thank you for what seems to be a perfect system. On monday you will have a new member, for sure. I am in my “trial” week with MLSP. I hope I can get out of there
quickly. Because MLMZing is definately my choice.
If I had come aware of MLMZing a week ago, I would definately not have joined MLSP.
Thank you for what seems to be a perfect system.
On monday you will have a new member, for sure.

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by admin http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-89 admin Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:07:47 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-89 Hi Michelle. Let me know if I can help in any way. Hi Michelle.

Let me know if I can help in any way.

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by Michelle http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-87 Michelle Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:38:36 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-87 I'm already more convinced with MLMZing than MLSP just because of the presentation.. definitely less of a buzz wordy pitch, more information about what you might get for your money and a simple compensation plan. I'm still not sure I can afford $300 to give it a try just yet, but I'll be thinking hard about it. I’m already more convinced with MLMZing than MLSP just because of the presentation.. definitely less of a buzz wordy pitch, more information about what you might get for your money and a simple compensation plan. I’m still not sure I can afford $300 to give it a try just yet, but I’ll be thinking hard about it.

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by Oleg http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-17 Oleg Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:58:22 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-17 Andrew, you are absolytely correct regarding MLSP. According to one of the top MLSP leader, I am friend with, new MLSP members stay in average only 10 days and quit. Regarding MLSP webinars - they are always a sales pitch for Founders JV partners. It makes me sick just to see how they " educate" you to make additional revenue for owners of MLSP. You defenetely clarified soo well the key differences between MLMZing and MLSP. Andrew, you are absolytely correct regarding MLSP. According to one of the top MLSP leader, I am friend with, new MLSP members stay in average only 10 days and quit.

Regarding MLSP webinars – they are always a sales pitch for Founders JV partners. It makes me sick just to see how they ” educate” you to make additional revenue for owners of MLSP.
You defenetely clarified soo well the key differences between MLMZing and MLSP.

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by admin http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-8 admin Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:00:03 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-8 Yes, MLSP is a funnel for some big marketers. But all the top guys who are selling MLSP have their own marketing funnels created outside of the system. It is a recurring commission, but it's quite low. $15 per month. You can easily make more money with MLMZing. But the real benefit of MLMZing over MLSP is clarity. The MLSP membership is a pitchfest. Yes, MLSP is a funnel for some big marketers. But all the top guys who are selling MLSP have their own marketing funnels created outside of the system. It is a recurring commission, but it’s quite low. $15 per month.
You can easily make more money with MLMZing.

But the real benefit of MLMZing over MLSP is clarity.

The MLSP membership is a pitchfest.

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by Trifecta Cashflow http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-7 Trifecta Cashflow Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:58:57 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-7 Good info here. There's a lot of rave about mlsp and income claims by some but it appears they are doing more of a spiderweb marketing to make money for those that sign up after you. It's not a true monthly residual opportunity, in that case, what you have here seems more practical. Good info here. There’s a lot of rave about mlsp and income claims by some but it appears they are doing more of a spiderweb marketing to make money for those that sign up after you. It’s not a true monthly residual opportunity, in that case, what you have here seems more practical.

]]> Comment on MLMZing Vs MLSP: A Review by Greg Bell http://www.mlmzing.com/mlmzing-vs-mlsp-review#comment-6 Greg Bell Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:45:17 +0000 http://www.mlmzing.com/?p=517#comment-6 About time! Someone with some information on this. You'd think considering how popular these are nowadays, some information would actually be pretty easy to find. Apparently not. Anyway, thanks for this! I appreciate it! About time! Someone with some information on this. You’d think considering how popular these are nowadays, some information would actually be pretty easy to find. Apparently not. Anyway, thanks for this! I appreciate it!

]]>